Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Men who use numerical scales to rate attractiveness of women are autistic incels
#1
Exclamation 
Attention: This is a public service announcement. If a man utilizes numerical scales to rate the attractiveness of a woman's face. He is most certainly an incompetent autistic incel, as he is simply judging their makeup efficiency. Overusing makeup can create the illusion of a perfect 10. When you go close to them, the entire image melts away. They do, however, succeed in creating attraction. They manage to look a lot better than they naturally are by making good use of make-up and enhancing their assets (boobs, legs, and asses): 

[Image: ir7vRr1l.jpg]

[Image: gakaxrRl.jpg]

[Image: 1J7GdcOl.jpg]

[Image: QaAXOsyl.jpg]

A woman’s face is either a) unattractive b) attractive and c) extremely attractive. Here's a breakdown:

Over the years, many studies have examined what people find attractive in faces. One important factor is symmetry. If you draw a line down the middle of someone’s face, the more similar the right and left sides of the face, the more attractive it is seen to be. Evolutionary psychologists have reported that we like symmetry in faces because it is a sign of health.

1. Asymmetrical face (unattractive). People's faces are deemed 'unattractive' exactly because their features deviate from the symmetrical set as a default for their sex.

2. Averaged face (good-looking looking/cute). 'Average' means having even and symmetrical features, which are generally rated more attractive than asymmetrical ones. The word "average" differs from the way that we normally use it when talking about looks and attractiveness. There is a big difference between 'average looking', as in plain, and the "average", as in a representative composite.

3. Extremely attractive face - Slightly exaggerated average. Attractiveness is not, as you might at first think, linked with distinctiveness; it’s actually the opposite. Researchers created artificial faces on a computer by combining photos of several people’s faces to generate a composite, “average” image. In preference trials, these highly average faces were consistently rated as the as the most attractive. What’s more, the more faces used to build a composite face, the more attractive the composite face was judged to be. A big reason for this was that the morphing process eliminates the asymmetries in the individual faces.

[Image: PFJF6g2l.jpg]

[Image: qYpLsJ2l.jpg]

[Image: Tjt43RLl.jpg]

[Image: 5PQ2K7zl.jpg]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)